RELATED TERMS: Iconic Designs and Iconic Designers; Imaginary

The Iconic
As acknowledged in Iconic Designs and Iconic Designers, the iconic approach to design is not wholly without merit. For example, it recognises that designs have cultural meanings and other-than-utilitarian uses, such as in the construction, maintenance and performance of self-hood and social standing. In other words, the notion of iconicity draws attention to designs as important socio-cultural phenomena or actants in everyday social practices and material public discourses.
The reservation expressed about the iconic approach to design was that, in as far as it seems to depend on a prior approach to art which emphasises titled ‘works’ and named ‘artists’, it might place design practice in a secondary or derivative position to art practice. ‘Iconic’ designs, considered as ‘works’, may be thought of as approaching, but never quite reaching, the value of an ‘art-work’. Iconic designers, equally, may be thought to approach the status of artists but never quite achieving it.
Continue reading “Iconic Designs, Critical Designs”




