Psychopower

RELATED TERMS: Biopolitics and Biopower

According to Ekin Erkan (2019: 218), while biopower may sufficiently explain the kinds of neuroses troubling citizens in the mid-to-late 20th century, psychopower, in contrast, is globalized and diffracted. As a system, it encompasses the organization of the capture of attention made possible by the psycho-technologies developed gradually through radio in the early 20th century, television in the mid-20th century and digital technologies in the late 20th century.

Psychopower results in the massive destruction of attention, exacerbated by ‘24/7 capitalism’, “where generalized human life is inscribed into duration without breaks and defined by a principle of continuous functioning (and sleeplessness)” (Erkan, 2019: 218).

Design challenge or design paradox

In this context, a challenge for design practices might be expressed as follows:

How can you use what Rosen (2012) calls the ‘weapons of mass distraction’ (broadcast media plus internet-based media) to gain the attention of people in order for them to be able to focus on the problems (at various scales) in which they are entangled? This is conceived as problem setting rather than problem solving.

If you do not use those media, people will not see your design. If you do use those media, they will be unable to act on it, because they will not be attending to it and focusing on it (Rosen, 2012). A further difficulty is that, given the proliferation of information and misinformation, people will find it difficult to decide who or what to trust as a basis and an orientation for action (Quill, 2014).

In this context, Larry Rosen (2012) makes a distinction between addiction and obsession. He argues that people are obsessed by their devices and platforms, such as smartphones and Facebook. Simplifying greatly, he argues that addiction stems from a need to increase neurotransmitters, such as dopamine, endorphins and others, in our brain, while obsession stems from a need to decrease neurotransmitters that are related to anxiety. He adds the caveat that obsessions also increase other neurotransmitters that block positive, elevated moods and produce anxiety.

Of relevance for design practice is that anxiety spans addiction and obsession, both of which affect the ability of attend and to focus. Both, in other words, affect human actantiality as capability to act-in-situation, to be able to recognise, constitute and act upon affordances. What might be described as a perceptual and interactional impoverishment ensues.

References

Erkan, E. (2019) ‘Psychopower and ordinary madness: Reticulated dividuals in cognitive capitalism’, Cosmos and History, 15(1), pp. 214–241.

Quill, L. (2014) Secrets and Democracy. Houndmills, Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

Rosen, L. D. (2012) ‘Weapons of Mass Distraction: why we have lost the ability to focus’, Psychology Today, (18 December). Available at: https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/rewired-the-psychology-technology/201212/weapons-mass-distraction (Accessed: 28 June 2021).

Published by aparsons474

Allan Parsons is an independent scholar

Leave a comment